Robert Eaglestone

1.3k citations
42 papers · 410 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Eaglestone

35 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Robert Eaglestone
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Literature and Literary Theory 165
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 39
  • Philosophy 90
  • Social Psychology 79
  • Cultural Studies 30
Replace Rei Terada with:
Rei Terada United States
Geoffrey Galt Harpham United States
Barbara A. Biesecker United States
Susan S. Lanser United States
Michael Naas United States
Wlad Godzich Portugal
Margaret Atack United Kingdom
Charles Altierí United States
Stephen Halliwell United Kingdom
Hazard Adams South Korea
Robert Eaglestone relative to Rei Terada United States Rei Terada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Rei Terada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Eaglestone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Eaglestone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Eaglestone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Eaglestone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Eaglestone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Eaglestone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Eaglestone. The network helps show where Robert Eaglestone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Robert Eaglestone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Eaglestone Line = papers co-authored together Robert Eaglestone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199772
2 200463
3 200439
4 201338
5 202028
6 200817
7 200413
8 201311
9 201311
10
Postmodernism and Holocaust Denial
199710
11 20089
12 20119
13 20028
14 19988
15 20027
16 20137
17 20097
18
Literature: Why It Matters
20197
19 20177
20
Studying English: A Guide for Literature Students
20156

About Robert Eaglestone

Robert Eaglestone is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 42 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (7 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (6 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (3 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (3 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (2 papers), Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (2 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (2 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (165 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (39 citations), Philosophy (90 citations), Social Psychology (79 citations) and Cultural Studies (30 citations). Robert Eaglestone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Gert Buelens, Sam Durrant, Paul Sheehan, Stephen Melville, Steven Connor, Catherine Constable, Ursula K. Heise, Julian Murphet, Philip Auslander and Costas Douzinas. Their work appears in journals such as Rethinking History, Critical Survey, Textual Practice, European Journal of English Studies and Teksty Drugie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact