Film & history

363 papers and 588 indexed citations i.

About

The 363 papers published in Film & history in the last decades have received a total of 588 indexed citations. Papers published in Film & history usually cover Economics and Econometrics (146 papers), Sociology and Political Science (114 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (72 papers) specifically the topics of Cinema and Media Studies (143 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (48 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Film & history are Alan S. Marcus, Scott Alan Metzger, Jeremy D. Stoddard, Joshua A Hirsch, Brian T. Edwards, John E. O’Connor, H. Bruce Franklin, Michael Curtin, Melvin Small and M. R. Turner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Film & history

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Film & history. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Film & history.

Countries where authors publish in Film & history

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Film & history. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Film & history with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Film & history more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025