Ecological Modelling

9.8k papers and 333.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 9.8k papers published in Ecological Modelling in the last decades have received a total of 333.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Ecological Modelling usually cover Global and Planetary Change (3.7k papers), Ecology (3.3k papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.9k papers) specifically the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1.7k papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (914 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (892 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ecological Modelling are Robert P. Anderson, Steven J. Phillips, Robert E. Schapire, Antoine Guisan, Clément Calenge, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, Sven Erik Jørgensen, Villy Christensen, A. Townsend Peterson and Pierre Legendre.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ecological Modelling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ecological Modelling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ecological Modelling.

Countries where authors publish in Ecological Modelling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ecological Modelling. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ecological Modelling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ecological Modelling more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025