Countries where authors publish in Early Popular Visual Culture
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Early Popular Visual Culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Early Popular Visual Culture more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture
This network shows the impact of papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture.
About Early Popular Visual Culture
The 293 papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture in the last decades have received a total of 847 indexed citations . Papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (72 papers), Museology (34 papers), History (82 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (30 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (66 papers) specifically the topics of Cinema and Media Studies (116 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (39 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (37 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (36 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (24 papers), History of Science and Natural History (14 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (14 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Early Popular Visual Culture are André Gaudreault, Simone Natale, Erkki Huhtamo, Stephen Bottomore, Sadiah Qureshi, William Uricchio, Simon Schaffer, David A. H. Wilson, Malcolm Cook and Peter Lamont.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.