Peter Lamont
Impact in
- General Psychology top 5%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Jungian Analytical Psychology
Papers in
- Philosophy 13
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 11
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 2
-
- Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs 12
- Jungian Analytical Psychology 3
- Co-authors
- Richard J. Wiseman (5 shared papers)John M. Henderson (4 shared papers)Tim J. Smith (3 shared papers)Cláudia Couto de Barros Coelho (3 shared papers)Andrew T. M. McKinlay (1 shared paper)Crispin N. Bates (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Perception (2 papers)Review of General Psychology (2 papers)History of Psychology (2 papers)Nature reviews. Neuroscience (1 paper)The English Historical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Peter Lamont
31 papers receiving 328 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- General Psychology 30
- Social Psychology 167
- Philosophy 86
- Cognitive Neuroscience 120
- Literature and Literary Theory 59
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lamont
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lamont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lamont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lamont more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lamont
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lamont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lamont. The network helps show where Peter Lamont may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Peter Lamont, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magic in Theory: An Introduction to the Theoretical and Psychological Elements of Conjuring | 2005 | 61 |
| 2 | 2004 | 33 | |
| 3 | Magic in Theory | 1999 | 29 |
| 4 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 14 | The First Psychic: The Peculiar Mystery of a Notorious Victorian Wizard | 2005 | 8 |
| 15 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 20 | The Secret History of Magic: The True Story of a Deceptive Art | 2018 | 5 |
About Peter Lamont
Peter Lamont is a scholar working on Philosophy, Social Psychology, General Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (12 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (11 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (3 papers), Jungian Analytical Psychology (3 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (30 citations), Social Psychology (167 citations), Philosophy (86 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (120 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (59 citations). Peter Lamont has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Wiseman, John M. Henderson, Tim J. Smith, Cláudia Couto de Barros Coelho, Andrew T. M. McKinlay and Crispin N. Bates. Their work appears in journals such as Perception, Review of General Psychology, History of Psychology, Nature reviews. Neuroscience and The English Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.