Peter Lamont
Impact in
- General Psychology top 5%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Jungian Analytical Psychology
Papers in
-
- Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs 11
- Jungian Analytical Psychology 3
- Philosophy 12
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 10
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 2
- Co-authors
- Richard Wiseman (5 shared papers)John M. Henderson (4 shared papers)Tim J. Smith (3 shared papers)Cláudia Coelho (3 shared papers)Andrew McKinlay (1 shared paper)Crispin Bates (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Review of General Psychology (2 papers)History of Psychology (2 papers)Perception (2 papers)Theory & Psychology (1 paper)The Historical Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Peter Lamont
28 papers receiving 296 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- General Psychology 26
- Social Psychology 148
- Philosophy 77
- Cognitive Neuroscience 112
- Literature and Literary Theory 46
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lamont
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lamont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lamont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lamont more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lamont
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lamont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lamont. The network helps show where Peter Lamont may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Peter Lamont, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magic in Theory: An Introduction to the Theoretical and Psychological Elements of Conjuring | 2005 | 55 |
| 2 | 2004 | 30 | |
| 3 | Magic in Theory | 1999 | 25 |
| 4 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 17 | The Secret History of Magic: The True Story of a Deceptive Art | 2018 | 5 |
| 18 | The Rise of the Indian Rope Trick: How a Spectacular Hoax Became History | 2004 | 5 |
| 19 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 4 |
About Peter Lamont
Peter Lamont is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (11 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (10 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (3 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (3 papers), Jungian Analytical Psychology (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (26 citations), Social Psychology (148 citations), Philosophy (77 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (112 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (46 citations). Peter Lamont has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Richard Wiseman, John M. Henderson, Tim J. Smith, Cláudia Coelho, Andrew McKinlay and Crispin Bates. Their work appears in journals such as Review of General Psychology, History of Psychology, Perception, Theory & Psychology and The Historical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.