Journal of Visual Art Practice

255 papers and 561 indexed citations i.

About

The 255 papers published in Journal of Visual Art Practice in the last decades have received a total of 561 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Visual Art Practice usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (144 papers), Urban Studies (42 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (40 papers) specifically the topics of Artistic and Creative Research (54 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (45 papers) and Art, Politics, and Modernism (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Visual Art Practice are Ken Friedman, Estelle Barrett, Graeme Harper, William P. Seeley, Ian Sutherland, Sophia Krzys Acord, Alain Quemin, Kathryn Brown, Paul Reilly and John Roberts.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Visual Art Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Visual Art Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Visual Art Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Visual Art Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Visual Art Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Visual Art Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Visual Art Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025