Pacific Economic Review

786 papers and 8.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 786 papers published in Pacific Economic Review in the last decades have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Pacific Economic Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (512 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (359 papers) and Finance (219 papers) specifically the topics of Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (169 papers), Global trade and economics (165 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (147 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pacific Economic Review are Yin‐Wong Cheung, John F. Helliwell, Gregory C. Chow, Xingwang Qian, Shawna Grosskopf, Jeffrey A. Frankel, Paresh Kumar Narayan, Robert G. Chambers, Xuesong Li and James J. Heckman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pacific Economic Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pacific Economic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pacific Economic Review.

Countries where authors publish in Pacific Economic Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pacific Economic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pacific Economic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pacific Economic Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025