Countries where authors publish in TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM.
About TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM
The 1.2k papers published in TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM in the last decades have received a total of 9.3k indexed citations . Papers published in TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM usually cover Philosophy (379 papers), Education (816 papers), Speech and Hearing (93 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (140 papers) and Social Psychology (165 papers) specifically the topics of Education Practices and Challenges (375 papers), Educational Methods and Analysis (208 papers), Teacher Professional Development and Motivation (144 papers), Educational Leadership and Administration (104 papers), Values and Moral Education (95 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (88 papers), Educational Assessment and Pedagogy (77 papers) and Problem Solving Skills Development (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM are Muammer Çalık, Mustafa Sözbi̇li̇r, Robert M. Capraro, Mary Margaret Capraro, Nuray Senemoğlu, Mehmet Barış Horzum, Yüksel Göktaş, Rabia Meryem Yılmaz, Murat Özdemir and Sevda Küçük.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.