Countries where authors publish in Current Genetics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Genetics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Genetics.
About Current Genetics
The 4.4k papers published in Current Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 130.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Genetics usually cover Molecular Biology (3.7k papers), Cell Biology (587 papers), Plant Science (1.4k papers), Pharmacology (323 papers) and Biotechnology (176 papers) specifically the topics of Fungal and yeast genetics research (1.6k papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (639 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (611 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (465 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (425 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (373 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (324 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (308 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Genetics are Robert H. Schiestl, R. Daniel Gietz, Jeffrey D. Palmer, Hans‐Joachim Schüller, Ralph Bock, Jaap Visser, Stefan Hohmann, Stefanie Pöggeler, Kerry O’Donnell and Marc Lohse.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.