Cultural-Historical Psychology

397 papers and 1.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 397 papers published in Cultural-Historical Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Cultural-Historical Psychology usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (233 papers), Information Systems (138 papers) and Education (106 papers) specifically the topics of Psychology of Development and Education (192 papers), Educational Methods and Teacher Development (117 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cultural-Historical Psychology are Nikolai Veresov, Annalisa Sannino, A.A. Margolis, Yrjö Engeström, Dmitry Leontiev, Anna Stetsenko, А.Б. Холмогорова, Манолис Дафермос, Nikolay Veraksa and Evgeny Osin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cultural-Historical Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cultural-Historical Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cultural-Historical Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Cultural-Historical Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cultural-Historical Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cultural-Historical Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cultural-Historical Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025