Culture, theory and critique

327 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 327 papers published in Culture, theory and critique in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Culture, theory and critique usually cover Sociology and Political Science (143 papers), Philosophy (68 papers) and Cultural Studies (50 papers) specifically the topics of Music History and Culture (28 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (24 papers) and Exploration of Posthumanist Performativity in Social Sciences (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Culture, theory and critique are Helena Pedersen, Donna M. Goldstein, David Lipset, Michael Taussig, Ilana Gershon, Martín Savransky, Sharon Sliwinski, Amanda Weidman, William J. Mitchell and Gottfried Boehm.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Culture, theory and critique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Culture, theory and critique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Culture, theory and critique.

Countries where authors publish in Culture, theory and critique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Culture, theory and critique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Culture, theory and critique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Culture, theory and critique more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025