Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies

2.2k citations
326 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Anthropology top 10%
    • Anthropological Studies and Insights
    • Indigenous Cultures and History
    • Migration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics

Papers in

    • Latin American and Latino Studies 54
    • Caribbean history, culture, and politics 39
    • Indigenous Cultures and History 55
    • Anthropological Studies and Insights 48

Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies

268 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Anthropology 569
  • Cultural Studies 381
  • Political Science and International Relations 859
  • Health 192
  • Development 81
Replace The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology with:
The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology United States
Revista Colombiana de Antropología Colombia
Cultural Dynamics United States
City & Society United States
Foucault Studies United States
Focaal United Kingdom
Urban anthropology and studies of cultural systems and world economic development United States
Distinktion Journal of Social Theory United Kingdom
CR The New Centennial Review United States
Radical philosophy United Kingdom
Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies relative to The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology United States The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies.

About Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies

The 326 papers published in Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies usually cover Cultural Studies (113 papers), Anthropology (122 papers), Political Science and International Relations (161 papers), Health (32 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (131 papers) specifically the topics of Politics and Society in Latin America (141 papers), Indigenous Cultures and History (55 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (54 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (48 papers), Caribbean history, culture, and politics (39 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (35 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (31 papers) and Cuban History and Society (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies are John-Andrew McNeish, Nancy Postero, Nicole Fabricant, León Zámosc, Peter Wade, Almut Schilling‐Vacaflor, Anders Burman, Andrew Canessa, Rosaleen Howard and Serafín M. Coronel-­Molina.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact