Clinical and Translational Medicine

1.4k papers and 30.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Clinical and Translational Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 30.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical and Translational Medicine usually cover Molecular Biology (776 papers), Cancer Research (349 papers) and Oncology (334 papers) specifically the topics of RNA modifications and cancer (155 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (142 papers) and Immune cells in cancer (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical and Translational Medicine are Edward Kai‐Hua Chow, Paul T. King, Lissa Nurrul Abdullah, Mahin Khatami, Hiroshi Maeda, Prakash Rai, Brandon Piel, Stephanie Tran, Sarika Srivastava and Paige M. Glumac.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical and Translational Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical and Translational Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical and Translational Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical and Translational Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical and Translational Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical and Translational Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical and Translational Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025