Nature Reviews Urology

2.1k papers and 49.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Nature Reviews Urology in the last decades have received a total of 49.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Reviews Urology usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (906 papers), Surgery (577 papers) and Molecular Biology (489 papers) specifically the topics of Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (465 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (376 papers) and Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (284 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Reviews Urology are Betsy Foxman, W. Marston Linehan, Wong-Ho Chow, Linda M. Dong, Susan S. Devesa, Csilla Krausz, Antoni Riera‐Escamilla, Laura S. Schmidt, Robert Kypta and Gil Redelman‐Sidi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Reviews Urology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Reviews Urology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Reviews Urology.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Reviews Urology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Reviews Urology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Reviews Urology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Reviews Urology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025