This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cryoletters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cryoletters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cryoletters more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cryoletters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cryoletters.
About Cryoletters
The 294 papers published in Cryoletters in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Cryoletters usually cover Reproductive Medicine (54 papers), Physiology (21 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (47 papers), Plant Science (63 papers) and Molecular Biology (81 papers) specifically the topics of Plant tissue culture and regeneration (68 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (52 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (46 papers), Seed Germination and Physiology (42 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (16 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (10 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (9 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cryoletters are Florent Engelmann, Louise Slade, Howard G. Levine, Barbara M. Reed, Gábor Vajta, Henrik Callesen, L. E. Towill, J. Dereuddre, P.J. Booth and T. Greve.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.