Current Opinion in Toxicology

363 papers and 8.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 363 papers published in Current Opinion in Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 8.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Opinion in Toxicology usually cover Molecular Biology (131 papers), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (119 papers) and Immunology (39 papers) specifically the topics of Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (48 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (33 papers) and Animal testing and alternatives (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Toxicology are Krithika Lingappan, Helmut Sies, Max Costa, Bhagavatula Moorthy, Alex Veith, Albena T. Dinkova‐Kostova, Rumen V. Kostov, Kira M. Holmström, Shahid P. Baba and Aruni Bhatnagar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025