Trends in Cognitive Sciences

490.1k citations
3.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • Neural dynamics and brain function
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
    • Face Recognition and Perception

Papers in

    • Neural dynamics and brain function 763
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 516
    • Memory and Neural Mechanisms 451
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms 364
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 308
    • Face Recognition and Perception 238

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

3.2k papers receiving 470.4k citations

Peers

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 304.8k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 100.7k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 71.8k
  • General Decision Sciences 10.3k
  • Social Psychology 91.0k
Replace Neuropsychologia with:
Neuropsychologia United States
Frontiers in Psychology China
Psychological Science United States
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience United States
Behavioral and Brain Sciences United States
The American Journal of Psychology United States
Journal of Experimental Psychology General United States
Cerebral Cortex United States
Psychophysiology United States
Nature Neuroscience United States
Trends in Cognitive Sciences relative to Neuropsychologia United States Neuropsychologia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Neuropsychologia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trends in Cognitive Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

About Trends in Cognitive Sciences

The 3.4k papers published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 490.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (2.3k papers), General Decision Sciences (102 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (664 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (644 papers) and Social Psychology (703 papers) specifically the topics of Neural dynamics and brain function (763 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (516 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (451 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (403 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (364 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (308 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (296 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (238 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trends in Cognitive Sciences are Alan Baddeley, Vinod Menon, Pascal Fries, Vittorio Gallese, Stanislas Dehaene, Russell A. Poldrack, Angela D. Friederici, Wolfgang Klimesch, Stephen Monsell and Kevin N. Ochsner.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact