Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice

28.2k citations
1.5k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Equine top 0.2%
    • Veterinary Equine Medical Research
    • Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
    • Animal health and immunology
    • Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology

Papers in

  • Equine 830
    • Veterinary Equine Medical Research 830
    • Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia 170
    • Animal health and immunology 104
    • Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology 98

Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice

1.4k papers receiving 26.2k citations

Peers

Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice
Comparison fields: 5 of 202
  • Equine 13.8k
  • Small Animals 6.4k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 4.2k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 2.4k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 2.3k
Replace Veterinary Quarterly with:
Veterinary Quarterly Netherlands
Veterinary Clinical Pathology United States
Pferdeheilkunde Equine Medicine Germany
In Practice United Kingdom
Journal of Veterinary Science South Korea
Veterinární Medicína Czechia
Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice United States
Journal of the South African Veterinary Association South Africa
Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences Poland
Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde Switzerland
Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice relative to Veterinary Quarterly Netherlands Veterinary Quarterly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.6×
Veterinary Quarterly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice.

About Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice

The 1.5k papers published in Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice in the last decades have received a total of 28.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice usually cover Equine (830 papers), Small Animals (467 papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (195 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (137 papers) and Rehabilitation (86 papers) specifically the topics of Veterinary Equine Medical Research (830 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (170 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (158 papers), Animal health and immunology (104 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (98 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (89 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (56 papers) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice are Alicia L. Bertone, Philip J. Johnson, Tracy A. Turner, Norman W. Rantanen, Harold C. Schott, Raymond J. Geor, David E. Freeman, Ramiro E. Toribio, Jonathan E. Palmer and Dianne McFarlane.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact