Cognitive Development

1.6k papers and 46.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Cognitive Development in the last decades have received a total of 46.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognitive Development usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.2k papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (468 papers) and Education (420 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Animal Learning Development (962 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (324 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (247 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognitive Development are Michael Tomasello, Jean M. Mandler, Philip David Zelazo, Douglas Frye, Linda B. Smith, Robyn Fıvush, Susan S. Jones, Josef Perner, Elaine Reese and Patricia J. Bauer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognitive Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognitive Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognitive Development.

Countries where authors publish in Cognitive Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognitive Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognitive Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognitive Development more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025