Cognitive Neuropsychology

1.2k papers and 57.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Cognitive Neuropsychology in the last decades have received a total of 57.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognitive Neuropsychology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (574 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (218 papers) specifically the topics of Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (549 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (439 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (179 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognitive Neuropsychology are Glyn W. Humphreys, Alfonso Caramazza, Tim Shallice, Alfonso Caramazza, M. Jane Riddoch, George Lakoff, Vittorio Gallese, Laurent Cohen, David C. Plaut and Karalyn Patterson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognitive Neuropsychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognitive Neuropsychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognitive Neuropsychology.

Countries where authors publish in Cognitive Neuropsychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognitive Neuropsychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognitive Neuropsychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognitive Neuropsychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025