The Communication Review

431 papers and 5.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 431 papers published in The Communication Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations. Papers published in The Communication Review usually cover Communication (182 papers), Sociology and Political Science (153 papers) and Gender Studies (86 papers) specifically the topics of Media Studies and Communication (126 papers), Social Media and Politics (93 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Communication Review are Sonia Livingstone, Alexandra Segerberg, W. Lance Bennett, Nicholas John, Nancy K. Baym, Mark Andrejevic, Christian Christensen, John Keane, Nick Couldry and Michael Schudson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Communication Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Communication Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Communication Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Communication Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Communication Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Communication Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Communication Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025