Chinese Management Studies

781 papers and 7.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 781 papers published in Chinese Management Studies in the last decades have received a total of 7.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Management Studies usually cover Strategy and Management (364 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (289 papers) and Accounting (185 papers) specifically the topics of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (174 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (170 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (164 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Management Studies are Hui Lei, Phong Ba Le, David Lamond, Chang‐Hyun Jin, Zhihong Song, Mark I. Hwang, Dylan Sutherland, Jiuchang Wei, Stephen J. Frenkel and Xiaoyu Guan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chinese Management Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Management Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Management Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Management Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Management Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Management Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Management Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025