Biological Theory

665 papers and 7.1k indexed citations

About

The 665 papers published in Biological Theory in the last decades have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Biological Theory usually cover Sociology and Political Science (201 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (184 papers) and Molecular Biology (146 papers) specifically the topics of Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (189 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (167 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (77 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biological Theory are Manfred D. Laubichler, Kim Cuddington, Kim Sterelny, Bruce D. Smith, Kevin N. Laland, Ellen Clarke, Elisabeth A. Lloyd, Michael J. O’Brien, Evelyn Fox Keller and Scott Atran.

In The Last Decade

Biological Theory

581 papers receiving 6.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Biological Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biological Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biological Theory.

Countries where authors publish in Biological Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biological Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biological Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biological Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026