This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plant Direct. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plant Direct with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plant Direct more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Plant Direct. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plant Direct.
About Plant Direct
The 674 papers published in Plant Direct in the last decades have received a total of 8.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Plant Direct usually cover Plant Science (525 papers), Molecular Biology (351 papers), Biochemistry (26 papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (26 papers) and Horticulture (2 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Molecular Biology Research (200 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (121 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (101 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (89 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (67 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (57 papers), Plant responses to water stress (46 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plant Direct are Philip D. Bates, Markus Pauly, Vibha Srivastava, Bhuvan Pathak, Gota Morota, Jonathan D. Monroe, Tōru Matoh, Kumiko Ochiai, Harkamal Walia and Lai Wei.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.