Chemical Engineering Education

657 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 657 papers published in Chemical Engineering Education in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Chemical Engineering Education usually cover Media Technology (218 papers), Education (119 papers) and Architecture (110 papers) specifically the topics of Experimental Learning in Engineering (165 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (110 papers) and Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chemical Engineering Education are Richard M. Felder, Donald R. Woods, Armando Rugarcía, James E. Stice, Stephen Whitaker, Matthew W. Liberatore, Daniel E. Rosner, A. E. Dukler, Milo Koretsky and Phillip C. Wankat.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chemical Engineering Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chemical Engineering Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chemical Engineering Education.

Countries where authors publish in Chemical Engineering Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chemical Engineering Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chemical Engineering Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chemical Engineering Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025