Indonesia and the Malay World

447 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 447 papers published in Indonesia and the Malay World in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Indonesia and the Malay World usually cover Sociology and Political Science (380 papers), Anthropology (112 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (85 papers) specifically the topics of Asian Studies and History (332 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (60 papers) and Philippine History and Culture (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Indonesia and the Malay World are Lyn Parker, Marshall Sahlins, Michael Hitchcock, Pam Nilan, Kathleen Adams, Martin Sláma, Eva F. Nisa, Vladimir Braginsky, Abdullah Saeed and Annabel Teh Gallop.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Indonesia and the Malay World

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Indonesia and the Malay World. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Indonesia and the Malay World.

Countries where authors publish in Indonesia and the Malay World

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Indonesia and the Malay World. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Indonesia and the Malay World with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Indonesia and the Malay World more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025