Development Policy Review

1.4k papers and 24.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Development Policy Review in the last decades have received a total of 24.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Development Policy Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (505 papers), Development (404 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (396 papers) specifically the topics of International Development and Aid (403 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (241 papers) and Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Development Policy Review are Thomas Reardon, Merilee S. Grindle, Martin Hilbert, Simon Maxwell, Barry M. Popkin, Stephen Devereux, Julio A. Berdegué, Corinna Hawkes, Adil Najam and Carole Rakodi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Development Policy Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Development Policy Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Development Policy Review.

Countries where authors publish in Development Policy Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Development Policy Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Development Policy Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development Policy Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025