This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Blutalkohol. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Blutalkohol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blutalkohol more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Blutalkohol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Blutalkohol.
About Blutalkohol
The 615 papers published in Blutalkohol in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Blutalkohol usually cover Toxicology (108 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (139 papers), Pharmacology (55 papers), Classics (13 papers) and Clinical Biochemistry (17 papers) specifically the topics of Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (139 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (107 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (42 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (41 papers), Health and Medical Studies (33 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (28 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (26 papers) and Criminal Law and Policy (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Blutalkohol are Robert F. Borkenstein, Wolfgang Bonte, Rolf Iffland, Stephan Seidl, Andreas Alt, R. Aderjan, Asbjørg S. Christophersen, Michael Staak, Gisela Skopp and Elisabeth J Shakin Kunkel.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.