Forensic Chemistry

547 papers and 5.5k indexed citations

About

The 547 papers published in Forensic Chemistry in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Forensic Chemistry usually cover Spectroscopy (194 papers), Toxicology (193 papers) and Safety Research (120 papers) specifically the topics of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (193 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (155 papers) and Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (120 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forensic Chemistry are Edward Sisco, Igor K. Lednev, José R. Almirall, Kyle C. Doty, J. Tyler Davidson, Tatiana Trejos, Glen P. Jackson, Claire K. Muro, Thomas P. Forbes and Candice Bridge.

In The Last Decade

Forensic Chemistry

508 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Forensic Chemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forensic Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forensic Chemistry.

Countries where authors publish in Forensic Chemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forensic Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forensic Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forensic Chemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026