Addiction Science & Clinical Practice

665 papers and 8.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 665 papers published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice in the last decades have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice usually cover Epidemiology (402 papers), General Health Professions (268 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (237 papers) specifically the topics of Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (323 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (219 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (113 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice are Linda A. Dimeff, Michael L. Dennis, Christy K. Scott, Nick Heather, Alexander Y. Walley, Kathryn Hawk, Gail D’Onofrio, Kenneth L. Kirsh, Seddon R. Savage and Steven D. Passik.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Addiction Science & Clinical Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025