Current Aging Science

476 papers and 7.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 476 papers published in Current Aging Science in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Aging Science usually cover Physiology (128 papers), Molecular Biology (71 papers) and Aging (44 papers) specifically the topics of Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (44 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (30 papers) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Aging Science are Michael R. Deschenes, Ray Marks, Todd M. Manini, Osvaldo Delbono, Kunihiro Sakuma, Trygve O. Tollefsbol, Brian C. Clark, Janet L. Taylor, Alberto Sanz and Rhoda Stefanatos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Aging Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Aging Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Aging Science.

Countries where authors publish in Current Aging Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Aging Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Aging Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Aging Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025