Applied Psychology

1.9k papers and 81.0k indexed citations

About

The 1.9k papers published in Applied Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 81.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Psychology usually cover Social Psychology (659 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (605 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (453 papers) specifically the topics of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (512 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (151 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (144 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Psychology are John W. Berry, Stevan E. Hobfoll, Ralf Schwarzer, Shalom H. Schwartz, Albert Bandura, Michael West, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Daan van Knippenberg, Monique Boekaerts and Sharon K. Parker.

In The Last Decade

Applied Psychology

1.6k papers receiving 73.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Applied Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026