The Sport Psychologist

1.2k papers and 43.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in The Sport Psychologist in the last decades have received a total of 43.2k indexed citations. Papers published in The Sport Psychologist usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (923 papers), Social Psychology (792 papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (382 papers) specifically the topics of Sport Psychology and Performance (898 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (724 papers) and Sports Performance and Training (212 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Sport Psychologist are Jean Côté, Maureen R. Weiss, David Collins, Richard S. Lazarus, Ralph A. Vernacchia, Terry Orlick, Anthony P. Kontos, Barbara A. Walker, Bruce D. Hale and Daniel Gould.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Sport Psychologist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Sport Psychologist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Sport Psychologist.

Countries where authors publish in The Sport Psychologist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Sport Psychologist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Sport Psychologist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Sport Psychologist more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025