Nutrition Research Reviews

648 papers and 42.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 648 papers published in Nutrition Research Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 42.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Nutrition Research Reviews usually cover Nutrition and Dietetics (198 papers), Physiology (176 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (155 papers) specifically the topics of Diet and metabolism studies (102 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (100 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nutrition Research Reviews are Anthony Fardet, Jan Van Loo, R. A. Leng, Clifford A. Adams, Margaret Ashwell, Joanne Slavin, Mary Barton, Glenn R. Gibson, Louise Thibault and Geoffrey Livesey.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nutrition Research Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nutrition Research Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nutrition Research Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Nutrition Research Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nutrition Research Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nutrition Research Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nutrition Research Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025