Annual Review of Food Science and Technology

33.9k citations
362 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Proteins in Food Systems
    • Probiotics and Fermented Foods
    • Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
    • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Papers in

    • Proteins in Food Systems 53
    • Probiotics and Fermented Foods 40
    • Food composition and properties 26
    • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques 24
    • Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology 23

Annual Review of Food Science and Technology

350 papers receiving 33.2k citations

Peers

Annual Review of Food Science and Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
  • Food Science 13.6k
  • Biochemistry 3.2k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 6.2k
  • Biotechnology 3.1k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 2.9k
Replace Advances in food and nutrition research with:
Advances in food and nutrition research United States
Food Engineering Reviews United States
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Biomembranes United States
Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review India
American Journal of Food Technology Egypt
Dairy Science and Technology France
Methods of biochemical analysis United States
Annals of Agricultural Sciences Egypt
Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology/Advances in enzymology and related subjects United States
Food Quality and Safety China
Annual Review of Food Science and Technology relative to Advances in food and nutrition research United States Advances in food and nutrition research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Advances in food and nutrition research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Food Science and Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Food Science and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Food Science and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Food Science and Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Food Science and Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Food Science and Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Food Science and Technology.

About Annual Review of Food Science and Technology

The 362 papers published in Annual Review of Food Science and Technology in the last decades have received a total of 33.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Annual Review of Food Science and Technology usually cover Food Science (165 papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (89 papers), Biochemistry (34 papers), Biotechnology (46 papers) and Animal Science and Zoology (28 papers) specifically the topics of Proteins in Food Systems (53 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (40 papers), Gut microbiota and health (28 papers), Food composition and properties (26 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (25 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (24 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (24 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Food Science and Technology are David Julian McClements, M. Mónica Giusti, Jian He, Brendan A. Niemira, Fereidoon Shahidi, Priyatharini Ambigaipalan, Claire Berton‐Carabin, Karin Schroën, Guy H. Carpenter and Rotimi E. Aluko.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact