American Nineteenth Century History

378 papers and 587 indexed citations i.

About

The 378 papers published in American Nineteenth Century History in the last decades have received a total of 587 indexed citations. Papers published in American Nineteenth Century History usually cover Sociology and Political Science (182 papers), Political Science and International Relations (137 papers) and Marketing (135 papers) specifically the topics of Race, History, and American Society (135 papers), American History and Culture (135 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (129 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Nineteenth Century History are Naomi Zack, David C. Sim, Christopher Waldrep, Carmen Webb, Gad Heuman, Susan‐Mary Grant, Amy Wood, Emily West, Jay Sexton and Michael A. Hill.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in American Nineteenth Century History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American Nineteenth Century History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Nineteenth Century History.

Countries where authors publish in American Nineteenth Century History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Nineteenth Century History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Nineteenth Century History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Nineteenth Century History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025