The Chinese Historical Review

218 papers and 467 indexed citations i.

About

The 218 papers published in The Chinese Historical Review in the last decades have received a total of 467 indexed citations. Papers published in The Chinese Historical Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (182 papers), Cultural Studies (56 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (21 papers) specifically the topics of Chinese history and philosophy (149 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (69 papers) and Japanese History and Culture (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Chinese Historical Review are Bin Yang, Wu Guo, Jong‐Seok Lee, David A. Graff, Yan Xu, Zhao Ma, Kenneth M. Swope, Henrietta Harrison, Livia Köhn and Rana Mitter.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Chinese Historical Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Chinese Historical Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Chinese Historical Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Chinese Historical Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Chinese Historical Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Chinese Historical Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Chinese Historical Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025