David C. Sim

659 citations
47 papers · 264 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Christian Theology and Mission
    • Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

David C. Sim

39 papers receiving 171 citations

Peers

David C. Sim
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
  • Religious studies 237
  • Classics 15
  • History 9
  • Anthropology 5
  • Language and Linguistics 3
Replace Jean Louis Ska with:
Jean Louis Ska
Astrid Billes Beck
Frank ̈Crüsemann
Donald H. Juel United States
Peter W. Flint Canada
James R. Royse
Lawrence M. Wills
David A. deSilva United States
Adrian Schenker Switzerland
William Loader Australia
David C. Sim relative to Jean Louis Ska Jean Louis Ska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Jean Louis Ska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Sim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Sim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Sim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Sim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Sim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Sim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Sim. The network helps show where David C. Sim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside David C. Sim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David C. Sim Line = papers co-authored together David C. Sim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199645
2 200532
3 199629
4 200123
5 200214
6 199510
7 20119
8 19948
9 20078
10 20088
11 19986
12 20006
13 20005
14 20095
15 20145
16 19924
17
Ancient Jewish and Christian texts as crisis management literature: Thematic studies from the Centre for Early Christian Studies
20124
18 20144
19 19933
20
Matthew and Jesus of Nazareth
20083

About David C. Sim

David C. Sim is a scholar working on Religious studies, History, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 47 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (47 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (2 papers), Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity (1 paper) and Religious and Theological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (237 citations), Classics (15 citations), History (9 citations), Anthropology (5 citations) and Language and Linguistics (3 citations). David C. Sim has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John K. Riches, D. A. Carson, Mark Allan Powell, Fernando F. Segovia, Wolfgang Stegemann, Lynne Hume, Diana Edelman, Frank ̈Crüsemann, John M. G. Barclay and Jon Douglas Levenson. Their work appears in journals such as HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, Journal for the Study of the New Testament, The Heythrop Journal, Journal of Biblical Literature and New Testament Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact