Global Intellectual History

257 papers and 478 indexed citations i.

About

The 257 papers published in Global Intellectual History in the last decades have received a total of 478 indexed citations. Papers published in Global Intellectual History usually cover Sociology and Political Science (106 papers), Political Science and International Relations (98 papers) and History (72 papers) specifically the topics of Chinese history and philosophy (26 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (26 papers) and Development of Political Thought in Early Modern Era (18 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Intellectual History are Antony Black, Siep Stuurman, J. G. A. Pocock, Kapil Raj, Annika Rabo, Annabel Brett, Adam G. Dunn, Martin Mulsow, Sanjay Subrahmanyam and Quinn Slobodian.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Global Intellectual History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Intellectual History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Intellectual History.

Countries where authors publish in Global Intellectual History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Intellectual History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Intellectual History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Intellectual History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025