South Asian Review

458 papers and 557 indexed citations

About

The 458 papers published in South Asian Review in the last decades have received a total of 557 indexed citations. Papers published in South Asian Review usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (176 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (155 papers) and Philosophy (136 papers) specifically the topics of South Asian Cinema and Culture (157 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (106 papers) and South Asian Studies and Diaspora (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in South Asian Review are Radhika Gajjala, Elizabeth Sauer, Amardeep Singh, Pramod K. Nayar, Makarand Paranjape, Roopika Risam, Rohit K. Dasgupta, Nagesh Rao, Ahmed Gamal and Yamuna Kachru.

In The Last Decade

South Asian Review

231 papers receiving 441 citations

Fields of papers published in South Asian Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in South Asian Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in South Asian Review.

Countries where authors publish in South Asian Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in South Asian Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in South Asian Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites South Asian Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026