This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Art. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Art with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Art more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in American Art. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Art.
About American Art
The 499 papers published in American Art in the last decades have received a total of 825 indexed citations . Papers published in American Art usually cover Museology (198 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (390 papers), Conservation (38 papers), History (58 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (39 papers) specifically the topics of Art, Politics, and Modernism (284 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (142 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (92 papers), Art, Aesthetics, and Perception (91 papers), Photographic and Visual Arts (91 papers), Cultural History and Identity Formation (35 papers), Libraries and Information Services (32 papers) and Historical Art and Architecture Studies (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Art are Brian Wallis, Jules David Prown, Suzi Gablik, Erika Doss, Ivan Karp, Karal Ann Marling, Albert Boime, Rich Gold, Jennifer Roberts and Alan P. Wallach.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.