Leibniz Institute for Psychology

3.8k citations
262 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Leibniz Institute for Psychology

218 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Leibniz Institute for Psychology
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
  • Library and Information Sciences 88
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 496
  • Pharmacy 165
  • Applied Psychology 162
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 396
Replace Tavistock Institute with:
Tavistock Institute United Kingdom
National Foundation for Educational Research United Kingdom
Coram United Kingdom
Routledge (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Bournville College United Kingdom
Living with Disability United Kingdom
UniDistance Suisse Switzerland
Emerald Group Publishing (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Collegium Helveticum Switzerland
Rathenau Instituut Netherlands
Leibniz Institute for Psychology relative to Tavistock Institute United Kingdom Tavistock Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×12.6×
Tavistock Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Leibniz Institute for Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Leibniz Institute for Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Leibniz Institute for Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leibniz Institute for Psychology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Leibniz Institute for Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Leibniz Institute for Psychology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Leibniz Institute for Psychology at the time of their publication.

About Leibniz Institute for Psychology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Leibniz Institute for Psychology have published 262 papers, which have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 9 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 26 papers in Applied Psychology, 7 papers in General Psychology, 49 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 25 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty on the topics of Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (42 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (23 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (22 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (21 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (15 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (14 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (14 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Library and Information Sciences (88 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (496 citations), Pharmacy (165 citations), Applied Psychology (162 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (396 citations). Authors at Leibniz Institute for Psychology collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Scientometrics, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Chemistry and Physics of Lipids. Some of Leibniz Institute for Psychology's most productive authors include Michael Bošnjak, Kumar D. Mukherjee, Günter Krampen, Tom Rosman, Anne‐Kathrin Mayer, Jessica Daikeler, Holger Steinmetz, Katja Lozar Manfreda, Jutta Mata and Christine Emmer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact