Zeitschrift für Psychologie

471 papers and 6.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 471 papers published in Zeitschrift für Psychologie in the last decades have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Zeitschrift für Psychologie usually cover Social Psychology (119 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (116 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (103 papers) specifically the topics of Behavioral Health and Interventions (51 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (40 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Zeitschrift für Psychologie are Sigrid Blömeke, Jan‐Eric Gustafsson, Richard J. Shavelson, Terje Ogden, Dean L. Fixsen, Irving Kirsch, Anja S. Göritz, Holger Steinmetz, Rüdiger Kabst and Icek Ajzen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Zeitschrift für Psychologie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Zeitschrift für Psychologie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Zeitschrift für Psychologie.

Countries where authors publish in Zeitschrift für Psychologie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Zeitschrift für Psychologie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Zeitschrift für Psychologie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zeitschrift für Psychologie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025