Rathenau Instituut

261 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Peers

Rathenau Instituut
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 798
  • Information Systems and Management 508
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 498
  • Safety Research 340
  • Health Informatics 57
Replace Catholic University College of Bruges–Ostend with:
Catholic University College of Bruges–Ostend Belgium
PA Consulting Group United Kingdom
Open Knowledge (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne France
Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management France
ESCP Business School United Kingdom
Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Germany
Leibniz Institute for Psychology Germany
Emerald Group Publishing (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Tavistock Institute United Kingdom
Rathenau Instituut relative to Catholic University College of Bruges–Ostend Belgium Catholic University College of Bruges–Ostend's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.3×
Catholic University College of Bruges–Ostend · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Rathenau Instituut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Rathenau Instituut. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Rathenau Instituut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rathenau Instituut more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Rathenau Instituut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Rathenau Instituut at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Rathenau Instituut at the time of their publication.

About Rathenau Instituut

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Rathenau Instituut have published 314 papers, which have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 34 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 6 papers in Business and International Management, 17 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 17 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 14 papers in Information Systems and Management on the topics of scientometrics and bibliometrics research (34 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (24 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (24 papers), Legal Studies and Policies (15 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (15 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (14 papers), Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies (14 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (798 citations), Information Systems and Management (508 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (498 citations), Safety Research (340 citations) and Health Informatics (57 citations). Authors at Rathenau Instituut collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Fertility and Sterility, Scientometrics, Science and Public Policy, Research Evaluation and Journal of Responsible Innovation. Some of Rathenau Instituut's most productive authors include Laurens K. Hessels, Rinie van Est, Peter van den Besselaar, L. van Drooge, Jack Spaapen, Frank J. van Rijnsoever, Dirk Stemerding, Lambèr M. M. Royakkers, Edwin Horlings and Inge van der Weijden.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact