University of South Carolina Lancaster
Impact in
-
- Accounting and Organizational Management
-
- Natural Resources and Economic Development
Papers in
-
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments 8
- Top scholars
- Richard M. AutyBrian WynneA.J. BerryWilliam F. RinerG. EllisAlan DixWilliam DaviesFrançois Tardieu
- Journals
- The Astronomical Journal (12 papers)Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (6 papers)Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific (6 papers)Nuclear Physics B (6 papers)Long Range Planning (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
University of South Carolina Lancaster
205 papers receiving 5.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
- Management Information Systems 532
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 327
- Public Administration 106
- Transportation 192
- Computer Networks and Communications 673
Countries citing scholars working at University of South Carolina Lancaster
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of South Carolina Lancaster. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of South Carolina Lancaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of South Carolina Lancaster more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University of South Carolina Lancaster
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of South Carolina Lancaster at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of South Carolina Lancaster at the time of their publication.
About University of South Carolina Lancaster
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of South Carolina Lancaster have published 262 papers, which have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 8 papers in Transplantation, 5 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 6 papers in Instrumentation, 1 paper in Chemical Health and Safety and 22 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics on the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (21 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (16 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (14 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (8 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (6 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (6 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers) and Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies (6 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management Information Systems (532 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (327 citations), Public Administration (106 citations), Transportation (192 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (673 citations). Authors at University of South Carolina Lancaster collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including The Astronomical Journal, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Nuclear Physics B and Long Range Planning. Some of University of South Carolina Lancaster's most productive authors include Richard M. Auty, Brian Wynne, A.J. Berry, William F. Riner, G. Ellis, Alan Dix, William Davies, François Tardieu, Nigel Davies and David Otley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.