Circle Park

8.6k citations
312 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Circle Park

281 papers receiving 8.3k citations

Peers

Circle Park
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
  • Communication 1.4k
  • Library and Information Sciences 237
  • Information Systems and Management 594
  • Marketing 537
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 461
Replace University System of Georgia with:
University System of Georgia United States
Florida Department of State United States
Birmingham–Southern College United States
University of South Carolina Lancaster United States
Carlow University United States
Center for Open Science United States
Reinhardt University United States
American Sociological Association United States
Oglethorpe University United States
Carnegie Museum of Art United States
Circle Park relative to University System of Georgia United States University System of Georgia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
University System of Georgia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Circle Park

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Circle Park. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Circle Park with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Circle Park more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Circle Park

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Circle Park at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Circle Park at the time of their publication.

About Circle Park

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Circle Park have published 312 papers, which have received a total of 8.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 11 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 50 papers in Communication, 17 papers in Information Systems and Management, 15 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 50 papers in Information Systems on the topics of Public Relations and Crisis Communication (25 papers), Research Data Management Practices (16 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (15 papers), Social Media and Politics (14 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (13 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (13 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (10 papers) and Disaster Management and Resilience (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Communication (1.4k citations), Library and Information Sciences (237 citations), Information Systems and Management (594 citations), Marketing (537 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (461 citations). Authors at Circle Park collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Russia and have published in prestigious journals including Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Public Relations Review, Library & Information Science Research, Chemistry - A European Journal and Agronomy Journal. Some of Circle Park's most productive authors include Devendra Potnis, Moonhee Cho, Carol Tenopir, Donald L. Johnson, Michael J. Palenchar, James K. McNulty, Dania Bilal, Jeffrey C. Lagarias, Hongmei Li and Lu Tang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact