The Astronomical Journal

490.8k citations
18.5k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
    • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
    • Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
    • Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
    • Astro and Planetary Science
    • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations

Papers in

    • Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 6.5k
    • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 10.3k
    • Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 5.2k
    • Astro and Planetary Science 4.5k
    • Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 3.3k
    • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 2.0k
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 1.4k

The Astronomical Journal

16.8k papers receiving 459.0k citations

Peers

The Astronomical Journal
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
  • Instrumentation 135.9k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 463.4k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 65.4k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 14.1k
  • Computational Mechanics 21.2k
Replace The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series with:
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series United States
Astronomy and Astrophysics Germany
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society United States
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific United States
The Astrophysical Journal Letters United States
Astrophysics and Space Science United States
Physics Reports United States
Icarus United States
The Astrophysical Journal United States
Physical review. D United States
The Astronomical Journal relative to The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series United States The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Astronomical Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Astronomical Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Astronomical Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Astronomical Journal more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Astronomical Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Astronomical Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Astronomical Journal.

About The Astronomical Journal

The 18.5k papers published in The Astronomical Journal in the last decades have received a total of 490.8k indexed citations . Papers published in The Astronomical Journal usually cover Instrumentation (6.5k papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (15.9k papers), Computational Mechanics (2.5k papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.4k papers) and Oceanography (716 papers) specifically the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (10.3k papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6.5k papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (5.2k papers), Astro and Planetary Science (4.5k papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (3.3k papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (2.5k papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2.0k papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Astronomical Journal are L. B. Lucy, A. U. Landolt, William E. Harris, Ivan R. King, Yoshihide Kozai, David Jewitt, Jack Wisdom, J. Tonry, I. Neill Reid and Allan Sandage.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact