University of Nebraska at Omaha

12.0k papers receiving 282.2k citations

Peers

University of Nebraska at Omaha
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 5.3k
  • Social Psychology 22.6k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 10.7k
  • Information Systems and Management 6.9k
  • Communication 6.3k
Replace Wichita State University with:
Wichita State University United States
Twin Cities Orthopedics United States
Saint Louis University United States
University of Northern Iowa United States
Creighton University United States
John Brown University United States
Williams (United States) United States
University of Missouri–St. Louis United States
North Dakota State University United States
University of North Dakota United States
University of Nebraska at Omaha relative to Wichita State University United States Wichita State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Wichita State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Nebraska at Omaha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Nebraska at Omaha. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Nebraska at Omaha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Nebraska at Omaha more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Nebraska at Omaha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Nebraska at Omaha at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Nebraska at Omaha at the time of their publication.

About University of Nebraska at Omaha

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Nebraska at Omaha have published 13.9k papers, which have received a total of 311.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 249 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 984 papers in Social Psychology, 166 papers in Public Administration, 326 papers in Communication and 321 papers in Health on the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (424 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (268 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (224 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (180 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (172 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (167 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (163 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (157 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (5.3k citations), Social Psychology (22.6k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (10.7k citations), Information Systems and Management (6.9k citations) and Communication (6.3k citations). Authors at University of Nebraska at Omaha collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the Association for Information Systems, The American Journal of Surgery, PLoS ONE, Journal of Criminal Justice and Scientific Reports. Some of University of Nebraska at Omaha's most productive authors include Denham Harman, Nicholas Stergiou, Mark E. Wohar, Yong Shi, Stacie Petter, Roni Reiter‐Palmon, Cassia Spohn, Jeffrey A. French, John F. Shroder and Petr Pavlínek.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact