Twin Cities Orthopedics

911.3k citations
24.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Twin Cities Orthopedics

20.6k papers receiving 774.5k citations

Peers

Twin Cities Orthopedics
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Clinical Psychology 65.7k
  • Applied Psychology 12.2k
  • Social Psychology 49.5k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 25.5k
  • Statistics and Probability 15.8k
Replace University of Minnesota System with:
University of Minnesota System United States
University of Manitoba Canada
University of Wisconsin System United States
Loyola University Chicago United States
University of Nebraska–Lincoln United States
Iowa State University United States
Saint Louis University United States
University of Kansas United States
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee United States
University of Missouri United States
Twin Cities Orthopedics relative to University of Minnesota System United States University of Minnesota System's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Minnesota System · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Twin Cities Orthopedics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Twin Cities Orthopedics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Twin Cities Orthopedics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Twin Cities Orthopedics more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Twin Cities Orthopedics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Twin Cities Orthopedics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Twin Cities Orthopedics at the time of their publication.

About Twin Cities Orthopedics

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Twin Cities Orthopedics have published 24.0k papers, which have received a total of 911.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.1k papers in Clinical Psychology, 425 papers in Statistics and Probability, 207 papers in Applied Psychology, 106 papers in Transplantation and 375 papers in Safety Research on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (301 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (247 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (202 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (160 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (158 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (155 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (154 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (152 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (65.7k citations), Applied Psychology (12.2k citations), Social Psychology (49.5k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (25.5k citations) and Statistics and Probability (15.8k citations). Authors at Twin Cities Orthopedics collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Macromolecules and Inorganic Chemistry. Some of Twin Cities Orthopedics's most productive authors include R. Edward Freeman, Sanford Weisberg, John Fox, Joan C. Tronto, Donald G. Truhlar, Mark Snyder, Michael D. Resnick, Dante Cicchetti, Ann S. Masten and Paul R. Sackett.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact