University of North Dakota

430.8k citations
17.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Eating Disorders and Behaviors 620
    • Drilling and Well Engineering 294
    • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods 235
    • Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques 217

University of North Dakota

15.1k papers receiving 399.2k citations

Peers

University of North Dakota
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Clinical Psychology 45.4k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 17.5k
  • Applied Psychology 5.6k
  • Atmospheric Science 19.6k
  • Global and Planetary Change 22.6k
Replace North Dakota State University with:
North Dakota State University United States
Twin Cities Orthopedics United States
University of Minnesota, Duluth United States
University of Wisconsin System United States
University of Nebraska at Omaha United States
University of Regina Canada
University of South Dakota United States
University of Winnipeg Canada
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee United States
Creighton University United States
University of North Dakota relative to North Dakota State University United States North Dakota State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
North Dakota State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of North Dakota

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of North Dakota. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of North Dakota with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of North Dakota more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of North Dakota

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of North Dakota at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of North Dakota at the time of their publication.

About University of North Dakota

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of North Dakota have published 17.1k papers, which have received a total of 430.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.3k papers in Clinical Psychology, 755 papers in Ocean Engineering, 216 papers in Applied Psychology, 31 papers in Fuel Technology and 762 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Eating Disorders and Behaviors (620 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (504 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (361 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (294 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (240 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (238 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (235 papers) and Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (217 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (45.4k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (17.5k citations), Applied Psychology (5.6k citations), Atmospheric Science (19.6k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (22.6k citations). Authors at University of North Dakota collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and China and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Eating Disorders, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Fuel, PLoS ONE and Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. Some of University of North Dakota's most productive authors include Ross D. Crosby, James E. Mitchell, Steven B. Hawthorne, Stephen A. Wonderlich, Jun Wang, Larry Burd, Robert C. Nordlie, Turk Rhen, Sharon C. Wilsnack and David J. Miller.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact